In a perfectly bewildering column Jim Hoagland blames President Obama and Judge Goldstone for undermining Mahmoud Abbas. In It's up to Netanyahu he writes:
No one could accuse President Obama or Judge Richard Goldstone of South Africa of harboring ill will toward the president of the Palestinian Authority. But their separate worthy initiatives have resulted in pushing Abbas into a political dead end that complicates the chances for Israeli-Palestinian peace.
In the first case:
But the Arab mood has darkened significantly in the interim. The Arabs say that the encouraging rhetoric of Obama's Cairo speech in June has been washed away by his failure to deliver a total settlement freeze that includes East Jerusalem -- a condition that the new Israeli offer will not meet. A total freeze has become an Arab precondition for resuming negotiations with Israel.Israelis, on the other hand, are newly confident of U.S. support, which rattles the Arabs even more. Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu got a cold shower from Obama and congressional leaders when he visited Washington in May. He was told that he should accept the principle of a Palestinian state, which he grudgingly did last summer.
In the latter:
Whatever the Goldstone report's merits -- and they are lessened by its deliberate demonization of Israel's motives and milquetoast exculpations of Hamas's actions -- it seems to have been written with no feel for the political consequences it would bring for the peace process. The report also ignored the concern that it would create at the Pentagon and in other Western military headquarters with forces fighting guerrillas who use civilian populations and infrastructure as shields in modern asymmetrical warfare.On Capitol Hill, misgivings about Netanyahu were buried in a reflexive gathering around Israel under U.N.-inspired attack. The Goldstone fracas also helped push the politically sensitive Obama White House back toward a more supportive, traditional U.S. attitude toward Israel. Abbas -- not glimpsing the quagmire he was lurching toward -- went along with Washington's request to ask the United Nations to delay taking up Goldstone's report, only to back down when Jordan and Egypt joined Hamas in unleashing ferocious criticism of Abbas in their media.
Hoagland is giving way too much credit to Goldstone. As I've written, the whole report was conceived in sin. Of course it didn't take political consequences into account, it was meant to demonize Israel - as even Hoagland recognizes. And it was supported by even such moderates as Egypt and Jordan. The point of Goldstone was to aid those who wish to isolate Israel.
Abbas continues to be passive aggressive. This has been the hallmark of his career. Being Arafat's #2, he really had to be careful not to be too ambitious. With Arafat gone, he believes the way to get ahead is to do nothing and let others pressure Israel.
But what's really odd about the column is the way that it treats Abbas - not the peace process- as sacrosanct. If Abbas was interested in peace wouldn't he have accepted Olmert's offer last year? Would his PA still be publishing anti-Israel (if not antisemitic) propaganda if he were interested in peace?
Barry Rubin looked at much the same information back in October anc concluded that the Palestinians were not much interested in peace. Hoagland concludes that it's up to Netanyahu to make concessions to keep Abbas in power.
Israel's long occupation of Palestinian territory has helped produce the cynicism and weak leadership on both sides that confound would-be international shapers of peace and moral rectitude. Outsiders cannot resolve this conflict: Only an Israeli decision to end that occupation in fast order can lead to the security Israelis need and deserve, and to the dignity that Palestinians seek through a state of their own. That is the broader, more vital decision that Netanyahu needs to make.
If the Palestinians want a state of their own they need to build. It's 16 years past the point where anyone should still be maining the illusiong that a Palestinian state is the responbility of others.
Crossposted on Yourish.
Posted by SoccerDad at November 23, 2009 6:10 AMThe Palestinians believe its others' responsibility to give them a state. They talk about a unilateral declaration of independence but haven't done the hard work to wean themselves off dependence upon the world. Palestinian nationalism is a farce and every one knows it.
Posted by: NormanF at November 23, 2009 9:59 AMIsrael doesn't "occupy" "palestinian" territory since the territory never belonged to the so-called palestinians who never existed as a nationality and palestine has never existed as a sovereign state.
Posted by: Laura at November 23, 2009 12:06 PMIsn't it telling that Hoagland claims the American government "reflexively" huddles around Israel, as if there's no rational thought behind it? Certainly American rejection and criticism of the report couldn't have been based on valid points!
Posted by: Johnny at November 24, 2009 12:42 AMThe Palestnians are trying to build a 'country of their own'. Thats the whole point of resisting Israels brutal occupation which controls all aspects of Palestinian live from their movement, boarders,resources to who they can trade with.
It is Israel who is dependent on the outside world for its survival. Isael, just like any colony, needs a sponser [Engand for its creation and now USA for is survival] and would wither away without a colonial sponser. Without American support the jews in Israel would start to immigrate back to their former homes as the cost of sustaining a Jewish colony would become to high for most Israelis to bear.
Posted by: sass at November 24, 2009 6:09 PMCut the bullshit sASS, the so-called "palestinians" have never tried to build a country of their own but instead have only tried to destroy Israel. When Israel relinquished Gaza, what did they do? They burned down the greenhouses instead of using them, voted in hamas who used the territory to launch rockets at Israel. The entire movement to create a second arab state in palestine has always been about the abolishment of Israel.
Israel is not dependent on outside support. Go ahead and read "the Israel Test" and "Startup Nation" and look through Israel21c.com to see just what an economic miracle Israel is. Furthermore Israel is not a colonial state. Jews have a history in the land of Israel going back 3500 years. Jews ARE the indigenous people of Israel. So shove your islamist and left wing propaganda. People on this site are far too knowledgable to buy into it. Go post your filth on the moonbat sites where it belongs, such as the huffpost or the dailykos.
Posted by: Laura at November 24, 2009 7:16 PMOh and I should also add that the "palestinians" are the world's biggest welfare recipients. They are the ones who actually depend on outside sources for their survival.
Posted by: Laura at November 24, 2009 7:31 PMIF any other country recieved the same support as israel, they too could claim a 'economic miracle' .
Posted by: sass at November 25, 2009 1:04 AMIsrael does not now need the aid. (And, frankly, I wish they'd phase it out.) However, for too long Israel depended on the aid allowing it to get away with irresponsible economic policies.
The Israeli economic miracle emerged from entrepreneurship, not foreign aid.
Posted by: soccer dad at November 25, 2009 8:10 AM'The Israeli economic miracle emerged from entrepreneurship' of recieving aid it doesn't need from a country which can not afford it. And lets not forget the success from the captive market of the Occupied Territories in which the millions of Palestinians a forced to buy Israeli goods a hugely inflated prices. IF anyone could make a success out of oppression and misery then recieve all that 'aid it doesn't need 'its definately the zionist.
Posted by: sass at November 25, 2009 7:50 PMAre you capable of reason or just of repeating the standard Hamas refrain? From 1967 to 1993 the Palestinian economy actually grew at an impressive rate. When the kleptocrat Arafat took over, he killed the economic growth and diverted foreign aid to his cronies.
May I suggest that you look up Helena Cobban? Her anti-Israel pro-terror opinions are likely to bring much joy to your heart. They don't require any thinking.
Posted by: soccer dad at November 26, 2009 5:15 AMIndeed sASS you are incapable of reason. The so-called "aid" Israel receives amounts to 1% of its GDP. To claim that is what created Israel's economic miracle is laughable not to mention that money is military "aid" in the form of loans on the condition that it be used to buy military equipment from the US. You can't accept the fact that Jews are brilliant, industrious, successful people. Well deal with it.
Posted by: Laura at November 26, 2009 12:58 PMSoccerdad ,you make it sound the best thing to happen to the Palestinian people was the illegal occupation, which improved the economy. Why all the fuss then when they should be grateful that Israel has exploited labour, resources and production making them the classic definition of a captive market. .
http://www.btselem.org/english/Freedom_of_Movement/Economy_1967_1994.asp
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article9619.shtml
Laura, I do agree 'the jews are brilliant, industrious, successful people' and also ruthless, spartan,and fanactical . NO one else could portray themselves 'the victim' and gain so much.
Posted by: sass at November 26, 2009 8:55 PMEfraim Karsh, who is head of Mediterranean studies at King's College, University of London:
https://www.commentarymagazine.com/viewarticle.cfm/what-occupation--9485?mode=addview
"Prior to the 1967 war, fewer than 60 percent of all male adults had been employed, with unemployment among refugees running as high as 83 percent. Within a brief period after the war, Israeli occupation had led to dramatic improvements in general well-being, placing the population of the territories ahead of most of their Arab neighbors.
In the economic sphere, most of this progress was the result of access to the far larger and more advanced Israeli economy, the number of Palestinians working in Israel rose from zero in 1967 to 66,000 in 1975 and 109,000 by 1986, accounting for 35 percent of the employed population of the West Bank and 45 percent in Gaza. Close to 2,000 industrial plants, employing almost half of the work force, were established in the territories under Israeli rule.
During the 1970's, the West Bank and Gaza constituted the fourth fastest-growing economy in the world—ahead of such “wonders” as Singapore, Hong Kong, and Korea, and substantially ahead of Israel itself. Although GNP per capita grew somewhat more slowly, the rate was still high by international standards, with per-capita GNP expanding tenfold between 1968 and 1991 from $165 to $1,715 (compared with Jordan's $1,050, Egypt's $600, Turkey's $1,630, and Tunisia's $1,440). By 1999, Palestinian per-capita income was nearly double Syria's, more than four times Yemen's, and 10 percent higher than Jordan's (one of the better-off Arab states). Only the oil-rich Gulf states and Lebanon were more affluent.
Under Israeli rule, the Palestinians also made vast progress in social welfare. Perhaps most significantly, mortality rates in the West Bank and Gaza fell by more than two-thirds between 1970 and 1990, while life expectancy rose from 48 years in 1967 to 72 in 2000 (compared with an average of 68 years for all the countries of the Middle East and North Africa). Israeli medical programs reduced the infant-mortality rate of 60 per 1,000 live births in 1968 to 15 per 1,000 in 2000 (in Iraq the rate is 64, in Egypt 40, in Jordan 23, in Syria 22). And under a systematic program of inoculation, childhood diseases like polio, whooping cough, tetanus, and measles were eradicated.
No less remarkable were advances in the Palestinians' standard of living. By 1986, 92.8 percent of the population in the West Bank and Gaza had electricity around the clock, as compared to 20.5 percent in 1967; 85 percent had running water in dwellings, as compared to 16 percent in 1967; 83.5 percent had electric or gas ranges for cooking, as compared to 4 percent in 1967; and so on for refrigerators, televisions, and cars.
Finally, and perhaps most strikingly, during the two decades preceding the intifada of the late 1980's, the number of schoolchildren in the territories grew by 102 percent, and the number of classes by 99 percent, though the population itself had grown by only 28 percent. Even more dramatic was the progress in higher education. At the time of the Israeli occupation of Gaza and the West Bank, not a single university existed in these territories. By the early 1990's, there were seven such institutions, boasting some 16,500 students. Illiteracy rates dropped to 14 percent of adults over age 15, compared with 69 percent in Morocco, 61 percent in Egypt, 45 percent in Tunisia, and 44 percent in Syria."
Posted by: Laura at November 27, 2009 12:31 PM"Laura, I do agree 'the jews are brilliant, industrious, successful people' and also ruthless, spartan,and fanactical".
.......................................
I guess this puts to rest the notion that you are not an anti-Semite, just a "critic" of Israel's policies.
===============================================
"NO one else could portray themselves 'the victim' and gain so much."
............................................
Yes the fake people known as the "palestinians" have done precisely that.