October 7, 2009

Rumor Mill In Overdrive: Now US Will Be The One To Bomb Iran

As difficult as it is to believe, considering the perception that Obama will bend over backwards to give negotiations and talks a chance, there are rumors that the US is getting ready to bomb Iran themselves, rather than leave it to Israel.

That may make sense, considering the national mood--which is fed up with Iran:

A majority of Americans are skeptical that diplomacy with Iran will succeed and say the U.S. should use military action if necessary to prevent the Iranian government from developing a nuclear weapon.

A Pew Research Center for the People & the Press survey released today found 61 percent of Americans would support a military strike. Twenty-four percent said it is more important to avoid conflict even if that means Iran will end up building nuclear arms.

Of course, if everything Obama does were to be determined by the national mood, then the direction of his economic policies would be very different.

Be that as it may, there is another indication that the US may be considering taking matters into its own hands. According to ABC News, the Pentagon recently sent a funding request to Congress indicating a priority towards building a Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), a 30,000-pound that is capable of reaching targets buried as deep as 200 feet below ground. ABC has also posted a copy of the Pentagon request online.

ABC notes:

This is not the kind of weapon that would be particularly useful in Iraq or Afghanistan, but it is ideally suited to hit deeply buried nuclear facilities such as Natanz or Qom in Iran.
Assuming that the US is considering this and that it can actually pull this off, it would have a number of positive effects--it would
  • Put Iran in its place
  • Serve as a warning to Syria
  • Show that the US is willing to flex its muscles where it sees fit
  • Actually curry favor with the Arab world--which views Iran's nuclear plans with suspicion
  • Of course it would help out Israel.
And perhaps, by virtue of the fact that both the Arab World and Israel would mutually benefit from such an action by the US--Obama could claim that they owe him a debt, payable by sitting down and talking.

But let's first wait and see what--if anything--Obama is up to.

by Daled Amos
Posted by daledamos at October 7, 2009 11:00 AM
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Ma.gnolia
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlinkList
  • NewsVine
  • scuttle
  • Fark
  • Shadows
Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!
Comments

Great post! I really like your blog!!
COMMON CENTS
http://www.commoncts.blogspot.com

ps. Link Exchange?

Posted by: Steve at October 7, 2009 12:22 PM

we need to make it clear to them that we said stop, we mean stop, and you better stop or else, and if they dont, it's or else

Posted by: barb at October 7, 2009 11:35 PM

its bad omen to tell people how to behave in their own land, its even worst to do the job for the jewz. they would not do it for us unless we pay them with scamer likie Madoff

Posted by: carpiaux at October 8, 2009 1:29 AM

Obama would become a one term President and the liberal 'progressives' would blame the Jews like it's 1938.

Posted by: Empress Trudy at October 8, 2009 10:24 AM

I don't know...since the majority of Americans support the idea, it could become his first positive accomplishment.

Posted by: Daled Amos at October 8, 2009 10:44 AM

carpiaux, you degenerate, if Iran's nuclear bombs are a threat to those beyond its borders then we indeed DO have every right, in fact an obligation, to act upon it. Also the Jewish nation is perfectly capable of defending itself and does not need America to do the job for it. The only thing they would ask is that we simply stay out of its way and not act to hinder it.

Posted by: Laura at October 8, 2009 12:07 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?