September 11, 2009

It's not the communism ...

Martin Peretz is bothered that Van Jones is a Communist. On the other hand, it doesn't much bother Charles Krauthammer.

Another charge was that Jones was a self-proclaimed communist. I can't get too excited about this either. In today's America, to be a communist is a pose, not a conviction. After the Soviet collapse, Marxism is a relic, a pathetic anachronism reduced to its last redoubts: North Korea, Cuba and the English departments of the more expensive American universities.

However there are limits to Krauthammer's tolerance:

In the White House no more. Why? He's gone for one reason and one reason only. You can't sign a petition demanding not one but four investigations of the charge that the Bush administration deliberately allowed Sept. 11, 2001 -- i.e., collaborated in the worst massacre ever perpetrated on American soil -- and be permitted in polite society, let alone have a high-level job in the White House.

Unlike the other stuff (see above), this is no trivial matter. It's beyond radicalism, beyond partisanship. It takes us into the realm of political psychosis, a malignant paranoia that, unlike the Marxist posturing, is not amusing. It's dangerous. In America, movements and parties are required to police their extremes. Bill Buckley did that with Birchers. Liberals need to do that with "truthers."

Of course liberals don't do that. The Democrats allied themselves with Michael Moore in 2004; if he was against Bush and he was a celebrity that was enough. Promoting Van Jones to the White House is one more symptom of this recklessness.

Posted by SoccerDad at September 11, 2009 6:20 AM
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Ma.gnolia
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlinkList
  • NewsVine
  • scuttle
  • Fark
  • Shadows
Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!
Comments

Peretz vs. Krauthammer is an interesting comparison; there is probably a larger corpus of issues on which I agree with Peretz but I respect Krauthammer much more. Peretz has indulged pretty sad race-baiting from his liberal TNR perch, which the sober, mature and conservative Krauthammer has avoided to his great merit.

As for Van Jones, I would need to see pretty specific proof of some of the more extravagant claims made about him, the precise wording of the petitions, etc., before I bought the whole line. Glenn Beck scored a scalp, but whether this is a sign of Obama's jitters more than Jones' own objective demerits is unclear to me.

Posted by: Bruce at September 12, 2009 9:45 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?