"I will wait for Hamas to accept international commitments. I will wait for Israel to freeze settlements..."
Mahmoud Abbas
The International Monetary Fund has recently concluded that the West Bank's economy has improved dramatically in the last year. Michael Oren, Israel's newly-minted ambassador to the United States, recently pointed out in a Wall Street Journal editorial that six thousand new jobs have been created since 2008, trade with Israel has increased 82%, tourism to Bethlehem has increased 94%, and agricultural exports are up 200% -- all the result of a fusion between smart Palestinian planning, the Netanyahu government's relaxed trade policies, and its continued dismantling of military checkpoints.
In
that article in the Wall Street Journal, Michael Oren gives other
details, including that more than 2,000 new companies have been
registered in the West Bank with the Palestinian Authority since 2008.
And the reason for the success?
Much of this revival is due to Palestinian initiative and to the responsible fiscal policies of West Bank leaders--such as Prime Minister Salaam Fayyad--many of whom are American-educated. But few of these improvements could have happened without a vastly improved security environment.
While Oren gives credit for the
improvement in security to General Dayton's Palestinian security
forces, the fact remains that Israeli steps first created the potential
for security out of the chaos that is was(!?) the West Bank.
Oren also describes the difference between the political and economic pursuit of peace:
The West Bank's economic improvements contrast with the lack of diplomatic progress on the creation of a Palestinian state. Negotiators focus on the "top down" issues, grappling with legal and territorial problems. But the West Bank's population is building sovereignty from the bottom-up, forging the law-enforcement, civil, and financial institutions that form the underpinnings of any modern polity. The seeds of what Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has called "economic peace" are, in fact, already blossoming in the commercial skyline of Ramallah.
And don't forget that this
is not the first time that the Palestinians have had the means and the
opportunity to flourish during the past 60 years.
For instance, Efraim Karsh has written about the success of Palestinian Arabs before the Intifada:
The larger part, still untold in all its detail, is of the astounding social and economic progress made by the Palestinian Arabs under Israeli "oppression." At the inception of the occupation, conditions in the territories were quite dire. Life expectancy was low; malnutrition, infectious diseases, and child mortality were rife; and the level of education was very poor. Prior to the 1967 war, fewer than 60 percent of all male adults had been employed, with unemployment among refugees running as high as 83 percent. Within a brief period after the war, Israeli occupation had led to dramatic improvements in general well-being, placing the population of the territories ahead of most of their Arab neighbors.CAMERA also notes that:
...During the 1970's, the West Bank and Gaza constituted the fourth fastest-growing economy in the world-ahead of such "wonders" as Singapore, Hong Kong, and Korea, and substantially ahead of Israel itself. [emphasis added]
the Palestinian territories had one of the ten fastest growing economies during the 1970's, just behind Saudi Arabia (which benefitted from the oil shock of 1973), and ahead of Singapore, Hong Kong and South Korea. (World Bank, ratio of real per capita GNP in 1980 to real per capita GNP in 1970)This is not based on idle speculation either. It is backed up by the publication by The World Bank: Developing the Occupied Territories: An Investment in Peace
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
the industrial parks which the leadership of the [Israeli] Foreign, Industry and Finance Ministries is planning at this very moment, under total secrecy. The goal: to establish between 8 to 11 such parks on the cease-fire line between Israel and the autonomous areas, which the Palestinian Authority will control within the next few months.
Foreign Minister Shimon Peres is the one who envisioned all this, and those close to him say with pride: We are getting closer to Singapore, Taiwan and Hong-Kong, in huge steps.
And then, after the vision arrives to develop the cities Gaza, Dir Al- Balah, Ofakim and Sderot it will be copied in the cease-fire line between Afula and Jenin, to Mt. Hebron and Tul-Karm, and will reach the entrance of Kochav Yair.
Each industrial park will be established for about 10,000 employees, and will sit on 2,000 dunam of land, with considerable financial assistance from foreign investors and also governmental subsidies. The Palestinians will run them, and be its workers, for the most part.
The
difference between what was possible then and what Gaza suffers from
now under the Hamas terrorists is stark--and the difference today
between Gaza and the West Bank will not be lost on the Palestinian
Arabs suffering under Hamas rule. After all, there are just so many
times that Hamas can blame Israel for its failures--especially when
Israel is creating the possibility for the West Bank's successes.
Oren writes:
The vitality of the West Bank also accentuates the backwardness and despair prevailing in Gaza. In place of economic initiatives that might relieve the nearly 40% unemployment in the Gaza Strip, the radical Hamas government has imposed draconian controls subject to Shariah law. Instead of investing in new shopping centers and restaurants, Hamas has spent millions of dollars restocking its supply of rockets and mortar shells. Rather than forge a framework for peace, Hamas has wrought war and brought economic hardship to civilians on both sides of the borders.
Meanwhile, in the West Bank there is perhaps a growing realization that Netanyahu's 'economic peace' may be succeeding where others--including Obama--have failed:
Fayyad told Haaretz this month that he realized that "security was the glue between a thriving economy and proper government and achieving liberty for the Palestinian people." (On the question of whether or not Israel is a "Jewish state" -- an admission Netanyahu has been adamant about getting from the Palestinians and which he has hitherto been denied officially -- Fayyad sounded more Zionist-friendly than the New York Review of Books typically is: "The character of Israel, as the total character that Israel would like to have, is Israel's own choice.")
Back in May, Abbas said in his interview with Jackson Diehl of the Washington Post:
"I will wait for Hamas to accept international commitments. I will wait for Israel to freeze settlements," he said. "Until then, in the West Bank we have a good reality . . . the people are living a normal life." In the Obama administration, so far, it's easy being Palestinian.
Abbas will continue waiting, assuming that everything he wants will fall into his hands. However, if it is not Israeli concessions but rather Israeli contributions to the reemerging Palestinian that make the news, Abbas will find that the Palestinian Arabs of the West Bank are growing tired of waiting for him.
On a cautionary note, George Gilder writes in The Israel Test
that historically foreign aid intended for economic recovery is
conducive to corruption and failure, rather than economic growth. When
I emailed him about the apparent challenge that the West Bank poses to
that rule, he responded:
Hey, when you have a 40 to 60 percent drop in output in the midst of violence, it is relatively easy to get a rebound when calm returns and you have Netanyahu both standing firm against more concessions to terrorists and declaring his determination to open new opportunities for enterprise in the territories.
If Netanyahu's broad based economic recovery for the Palestinian Arabs is successful--and Gilder is a big admirer of Netanyahu's economic know-how--then maybe this time around the apparent Palestinian economic renaissance will be permanent, and auger better times to come in the region.
by Daled Amos Posted by daledamos at August 27, 2009 10:46 AMThe only problem with that scenario is Germany and Russia were each other's largest trading partners between the wars. Their extensive economic and political ties did not prevent the outbreak of hostilities between them in 1941. Israel and the Palestinians can have a harmonious economic pact but in and of itself, it won't dissolve Arab hostility towards Israel.
Posted by: NormanF at August 27, 2009 12:10 PMHave no fear - the Palestinians will screw it up like they always have. More money means more corruption. And when ordinary Palestinian businessmen begin to ask for better governance, less corruption, more say in how things are run, in other words, when they begin to question the leadership of Fatah & it's army of thugs, the Palestinian leadership will start terrorism all over again. If this idea of economic progress is to become meaningful, you have to get rid of Fatah. Fatah should be expelled from the territories, sent back into exile, or just plain dumped into Gaza if no one will have them.
Posted by: Terry, Eilat - Israel at August 27, 2009 12:15 PMNormanF,
Maybe. But it is not merely an economic pact between Pals and Israel--it is the economic prosperity they themselves have, and if stability can be maintained, the Palestinians are unlikely to mess things up...
To a large degree, it has been the leaders who have whipped up the Palestinian masses, not a hard thing to do considering the corruption and mismanagement of the Palestinian leadership.
WWII started in 1939--in 1941 Germany turned against Russia. At this point, I don't think that the Palestinian Arabs in the West Bank are comparable.
Posted by: Daled Amos at August 27, 2009 1:02 PMTerry,
This time may be different--the countries that are pouring in the money are keeping a closer eye and are less likely to allow them to mess up. Also, this is not just a matter of competing to get the available money: there are real businesses being established here. This time around, the Palestinians have a lot invested here, in more than just the metaphorical senss.
This does not mean they will not blow it, but I think there is reason to be hopeful--while being sure not to let our guard down.
And the benefit of the West Bank's stability leading to the greater instability of Gaza and thereby Hamas is too good an opportunity to pass up.
Posted by: daledamos at August 27, 2009 1:23 PMWith all due respect, I'm originally from an Arab country. In my experience, no matter how pessimistic you are about Arabs, they always exceed your expectations. Arab regimes are only competent in one area - staying in power. What you may see as irrational behavior makes perfect sense in the context of Arab politics. Arab culture cannot tolerate opposition to authority - this is true in the family, the clan, in business, in religion, & most especially in politics. Any challenge to a person or party in power is seen as a major threat to a degree not found in most other cultures. Ruthlessness is seen as a virtue, worthy of respect. In any case, making economic progress has never been a priority for Fatah (aside from personal economic progress lol).
Posted by: Terry, Eilat - Israel at August 28, 2009 2:03 AM