The Washington Post's Howard Schneider profiles PA Prime Minister Salaam Fayyad, A Palestinian Technocrat Rises Steadily, but Questions Persist. The profile is generally positive but Schneider notes some of the problems that Fayyad faces.
Here's one:
Ghassan Khatib, a Palestinian pollster and analyst, said Fayyad tends to fare poorly in popularity compared with Abbas or with more charismatic figures such as jailed Fatah leader Marwan Barghouti and Hamas official Ismail Haniyeh, head of the Islamist movement's de facto government in Gaza.
There's something missing here. Barghoutin and Haniyeh are not just popular because of their charisma, they're popular because of their terrorist activities.
At the end Schneider takes issue with an analysis by Dan Diker and Pinhas Inbari that's critical of the West's investment in Fayyad.
Schneider writes:
Analysts Dan Diker and Pinhas Inbari argued in a recent paper written for the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, a think tank considered close to Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, that the United States was "naive" to think its support for Fayyad would help him succeed without more local backing.That, Fayyad said, is something Israel could help with. He argues that his security efforts will obligate Israel, under international agreements such as a 2003 "road map" for peace, to take steps of its own -- including freezing Jewish settlement construction in the West Bank and stopping military incursions into areas put under Palestinian control according to the Oslo accords.
Note that, encouraged the Obama administration, Fayyad, of course calls for a freeze on "settlement construction."
But Schneider ignores some of the other criticisms of Fayyad in Diker's and Inbari's analysis. It also ignores ways that Fayyad himself works against peace with Israel. Palestiniann Media Watch continues to find that the PA is fighting a PR war against Israel over Jerusalem. Diker and Inbari note that Fayyad has been funding Hamas. And while everyone is parsing Binyamin Netanyahu's words to determine whether or not he accepts a two state solution, Schneider, like so many other ignores that Fayyad denies that Israel is a Jewish state.
In the end, Fayyad is better than most Palestinian leaders. But he has no real constituency, because he is not sufficiently opposed to Israel's existence. If peace will come in the Middle it will be when someone like Fayyad rises to power rather than being imposed from the outside. But that will take a remaking of Palesitnian nationalism, something that has yet to happen and won't happen anytime soon.
Crossposted on Yourish
Posted by SoccerDad at July 13, 2009 6:14 AMThe Palestinians have yet to cross their own Rubicon. Its not going to happen as long as the likes of Fayyad remain marginal in Palestinian society.
Posted by: NormanF at July 13, 2009 4:45 PMIsrael is not a Jewish State, it's a predominantly Jewish State and should remain so. It just blows my mind how the same people who would be the loudest critics of any country declaring itself an Aryan Nation are blind to the inherent racism in a Jewish State.
That said, I highly doubt that it is possible for any non-violent politician to win in Palestine right now, at least until Israel shows good faith in negotiation by carrying out its obligations under the Road Map. The PA has done everything it can to boost security within the strict limitations which Israel places on its security forces. You can't ask me to drive to the store, slash my tires, then complain because I didn't do what you asked me to.
Posted by: thinkaboutit at July 13, 2009 8:11 PMThe Palestinians have not fulfilled their obligations to disarm anti-Israel terrorist groups, to cease anti-Semitic and anti-Israel incitement and to prepare their people for peace with Israel. And there is no indication they intend to even do so. All of the Road Map demands are directly exclusively towards Israel.
Posted by: NormanF at July 13, 2009 9:14 PMYou're right that they need to make greater effort at reigning in the anti-semitism in the media, for sure. On the other hand, you really have to divide them into Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem. As long as they are forced to rebuild houses that the IDF bulldozed or blew up using mud and scraps because Israel won't allow construction materials into Gaza, you can turn the tv into 24h/day Zionist-Lover's Appeasement Hour and the anti-Israeli sentiment won't change a bit. As far as the West Bank, if Bibi keeps removing checkpoints, eases congestion, and creates serious reform rather than just token gestures, making the daily life of the Palestinians in the West Bank better, turning the tv into an all-day Hamas Martyrs' Telethon won't stop them from becoming less anti-Israeli. And the Palestinians in East Jerusalem, despite decades of being a second-class people in a Jewish State, are more or less happy to not be in Gaza or the West Bank.
Posted by: thinkaboutit at July 13, 2009 10:06 PM