Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said he wants to engage President Obama in "negotiations" before international media, a semi-official Iranian news outlet reported on Saturday.Speaking at a meeting of medical school deans, Ahmadinejad said Iran "will soon pursue a new round of diplomatic activity" amid a new position of strength for the Iranian government, the Iranian Student News Agency quotes him as saying.
"I will go to the United Nations and will invite Obama to negotiations," Ahmadinejad said, adding that such talks would be "in front of the international media, not a sit-down behind closed doors in order to talk about matters."
Well, that's awfully nice of him, considering what he was saying about Obama and the US just last week:
Yeah, that last part was a nice touch--completely incomprehensible, considering what he and the Iranian regime are doing to crush demonstrations."You were standing against the Iranian people in the past 60 years," Mr Ahmadinejad said during an address in the western region of Khermenshah that was broadcast by state television.
"Those who speak of change must apologise to the Iranian people and try to repair their past bad acts and the crimes they committed against Iran."
As to the troops, he said he expected two kinds of "deep and fundamental" change.
"Meet people, talk to them with respect and put an end to the expansionist policies. If you talk about change it must put an end to the US military presence in the world, withdraw your troops and take them back inside your borders."
Mr Ahmadinejad said the advocates of change must "stop supporting the Zionists, outlaws and criminals".
He called on the United States to "stop interfering in other people's affairs".
He also said the US government should "let the American people decide their own future ... Stop pressuring them," he added, without saying what he was referring to.
Obama is perfectly happy to mingle with tyrants, despots and thugs. But he prefers to keep America's traditional allies at arms' lengths. You can predict before Obama even acts which side he will instinctively wind up with. If I was Ahmedinejad, I'd take it as a source of comfort, indeed.
Posted by: NormanF at July 5, 2009 1:35 PMMaybe, but to take Ahmadinjad up on his offer means Obama would abandon both his original tepid response as well as his later stronger response.
His abandonment of the protesters to the Iran regime would the biggest betrayal by a US president since Bush 41 promised to help Iraqis against Hussein and then abandoned them.
Posted by: Daled Amos at July 5, 2009 1:55 PM