o George H. W. Bush helped get Yitzhak Rabin elected 1992 by undermining Prime Minister Yitzchak Shamir--refusing to provide Israel with $10 billion in loan guarantees to enable the absorption of one million Jews from the former Soviet Union.Not unexpectedly, US leaders do not have a monopoly on interfering in Israel's internal affairs.o In 1996, Bill Clinton came to Israel and actively campaigned for Peres, but in the end it was the Palestinian terrorism that instead securedNetanyahu's win over Peres.
o In the 1999 elections, Clinton sent Bob Schrum, James Carville and Stanley Greenberg to Israel to manage Barak's campaign against Netanyahu.o And the Bush administration, after refraining from getting involved in the Israeli elections in 2001 and 2003:
made it self-evident that it wants a Kadima victory and is willing to do a great deal to ensure that such a victory comes about. Since Sharon's second stroke two weeks ago, Bush and Secretary of StateCondoleezza Rice have made it clear that in Sharon's absence they want Acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to form the next government.
o money that the EU gave to Yossi Beilin's Economic Cooperation FoundationAnd the European meddling continues--these days even French President Sarkozy can't resist getting in his two cents:
o money that the EU gave to Rabbis for Human Rights, "which recently participated in organizing delegations of foreign activists who were brought here to stand in front ofIDF tanks and attempt to force their way through IDF roadblocks."
o the Norwegian government being one of the chief contributors to the Shimon Peres Center for Peace, whose operation is the main subject of Glick's article.
The French president reportedly told Netanyahu that while he usually scheduled talks with Israel's top foreign envoys on visit to Paris he could not bring himself to meet with Lieberman. According to Channel Two, this statement was accompanied by disparaging hand gestures.
Sarkozy then advised Netanyahu to fire Lieberman and bring former foreign minister Tzipi Livni back into the coalition, according to the report. [emphasis added]Meanwhile, Obama is trying his luck in Honduras. After commenting on the legality of Israel's settlements, Obama is now applying his knowledge of international law to Honduras. Allahpundit gives the background:
In a nutshell, Zelaya wanted another term as president so he decided to hold a popular referendum on whether he should be eligible. Minor problem: The Honduran constitution can't be amended by popular referendum so the country's supreme court ordered the vote canceled. Zelaya tried to go ahead with it anyway. Literally every other arm of the Honduran government -- judiciary, legislature, military -- was against him, to the point where the troops who arrested him this morning were evidently acting on a court order. Why such strong, unified opposition? According to one retired Honduran general cited byFausta, it's because Zelaya's a Chavez stooge and him staying on would mean "Chavez would eventually be running Honduras by proxy." [emphasis added]Despite the backing of that country's supreme court and congress, Obama has insisted that the coup is illegal--reminiscent of the US position on the settlements, which also have the backing of legal experts.
I can't see any reason for a strong reaction from the United States here except as a way for The One to prove he's different from all the other yanqui presidents in the past.Now that Obama has strengthened ties with the Arab world by showing his willingness to pressure Israel, is he now working on strengthening US ties with Chavez and his friends in Central America ?
Its kind of ironic that an Administration that promised to stop arrogance and interference in other countries' affairs does exactly the opposite in Israel's case. Israeli voters did not elect Obama to run their country and to decide their policies. The parties in Israel closest to Obama's policies did poorly in the February election. This is how the US keeps its promises - by telling Israelis they can't decide anything contrary to American wishes? For the US, being a superpower is more advantageous with some countries than with others.
Posted by: NormanF at June 30, 2009 3:28 AM"The French president reportedly told Netanyahu that while he usually scheduled talks with Israel's top foreign envoys on visit to Paris he could not bring himself to meet with Lieberman.
According to Channel Two, this statement was accompanied by disparaging hand gestures.
Sarkozy then advised Netanyahu to fire Lieberman and bring former foreign minister Tzipi Livni back into the coalition, according to the report".
................................................
Who the hell does Sarkozy think he is? He's every bit as repugnant as his predecessors. The entire Israeli contingent should have walked out at that point. Sarkozy would't even treat terrorists from hamas in this manner or some official from the Iranian regime. How dare he treat an Israeli official this way? When will Israelis acquire enough self-respect and stop allowing foreign powers to treat its officials in this atrocious disprespectful and contemptuous manner?
"Its kind of ironic that an Administration that promised to stop arrogance and interference in other countries' affairs does exactly the opposite in Israel's case."
It shouldn't be too surprising. Anything the left pretends to support or believe in takes a backseat to Israel bashing and Jew hatred.
Posted by: zee at July 1, 2009 12:20 PM