June 21, 2009

US Ready To Drop The 3 Preconditions For Talking With Hamas

It seems that appeasing minds think alike.

The EU apparently feels that it is no longer necessary to hold Hamas to the 3 preconditions that have been used as the litmus test for deciding on whether to open dialog with the terrorist group Hamas.
Government sources in Jerusalem said France led the efforts to keep what has become known as the Quartet's three conditions on Hamas from being included in the European Council's conclusions on the Middle East peace process.

Instead, the statement said the foreign ministers expressed "continued encouragement for inter-Palestinian reconciliation behind [Palestinian Authority] President Mahmoud Abbas and support for the mediation efforts by Egypt and the Arab League." [emphasis added]
As reported by Aaron Klein of World Net Daily, there is word that during Carter's meeting with Hamas, he relayed Obama's willingness to pursue a similar route:
Former President Jimmy Carter presented Hamas with a written initiative intended to open talks between the Islamist group and the U.S. without Hamas having to accept all conditions previously laid out for dialogue by the American government, top Hamas officials told WND.

Those conditions, expressed twice by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, are Hamas' renouncement of violence, recognition of Israel and agreement to abide by previous PLO commitments. The conditions were adopted by the Mideast Quartet, which consists of the U.S., United Nations, Russia and the European Union.

Carter, however, handed Hamas last week a letter "that aims to open dialogue between Hamas and U.S.," Mushir al-Masri, a member of Hamas' parliament and a spokesman for the Islamist group, told WND today.

Two top Hamas sources told WND Carter's initiative bypasses Clinton's conditions and instead asks Hamas to recognize the so-called two-state solution as well as the Arab Peace Initiative. [emphasis added]
Both the EU and the US would require only 2 conditions, one of which is backing for the Saudi Peace Plan. On the other condition, the EU just wants Hamas to promise to try to makeup with Fatah; Obama wants Hamas to commit to the two state solution.

John Hinderaker, who posted about Klein's report at Powerline, notes:
Is the report accurate? I believe Klein is considered reliable, and the story is, sadly, plausible.
There are alot of things about Obama's policy towards Israel that are equally sad.

by Daled Amos
Posted by daledamos at June 21, 2009 2:36 PM
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Ma.gnolia
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlinkList
  • NewsVine
  • scuttle
  • Fark
  • Shadows
Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!
Comments

Hamas will have gained international legitimacy without changing its fundamental stance towards Israel. The West will have helped a radical Islamist group to get a hearing without it having to recognize or deal with Israel. As a step, its going to make peace more distant instead of bringing within sight.

Posted by: NormanF at June 21, 2009 4:49 PM

But that is assuming that the goal to begin with is real peace. The West is not aiming for real peace, they just want the area to be peaceful--and if forcing concessions out of Israel until the Arab world is satisfied, so be it.

Posted by: Daled Amos at June 21, 2009 9:59 PM

Daled, if it means disposing of Israel as an irritant to friendly relations with the Arabs and Iran, then the goal makes complete sense. Not that the West really thinks real peace is possible, since then they would shun Iran and its proxies Hezbollah and Hamas.

Posted by: NormanF at June 21, 2009 10:15 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?