Soccer Dad

i think israels biggest fear is for a arab country to become strong enough to behave in the same manner as the jewish state, while seeking peace.

The Palestinians can have with Israel a status similar to the Basques, French Canadiens and Chechens. That is the most they can realistically expect to get from Israel. With a home rule government, its not all that different from Wales and Scotland in the UK, which have their own Parliaments and regional governments. What's wrong with that solution? So they have a flag? Autonomous governments around the world have all the trappings of statehood - just not the formal attribute of independence.

Such a solution should be acceptable unless one's true goal is the obliteration of Israel.

If indeed Arab countries behaved in the same manner as the Jewish state instead of the tyrannies and terror states that they are, there would be peace.

Demilitarization is a fantasy. They can't keep Gaza "demilitarized". Why should it be any easier for Judea and Samaria?

your solution is just rebranding the same old product-colonialism
how this for a solution-israel settles this conflict by following international and humanitarian law.

How can the native people of an area be colonialists? The only colonialists are the arab invaders of Israel.

your ignorance of the palestinians is matched only by your ignorance of the where the jews originated from.
how can the jews be called 'native' when they conquered 'the land called canaan'.

http://ifamericansknew.org/history/origin.html

like all colonial enterprises of the past, which needs need a sponser, the zionist first sponser was britian -for its creation; and now the USA -for its expansion. take away the sponserships from the zionist colonies in palestine and the jewish state would crumble under the weight of this costly venture into a arab country.

What do the Canaan's have to do with anything? The issue is who has a greater claim to the land of Israel, Jews or arabs, and the Jews were in Israel LONG before the arabs. It's time to expel the arab invaders from Israel.

Your ignorance of history is only matched by your vile disgusting hatred of Jews.

Zee,

If nothing else, Netanyahu's conditions--assuming the report is correct--will draw attention to the innate problems with the two state solution.

obviously laura your understanding of palestinian history, and for that matter jewish history, is based on the zionist version of history, which is full of myths and distortions. books such as joan peters 'from time immemorial' which was proven to be a total fraud from start to finish, yet is still a best seller for the purblind orthodoxy in america is a perfect example.

implicit in jewish mythogy, and actually stated in some zionist propoganda, is the notion that the arabs first came to palestine in the 7th century, at the time they were being converted to the moslem faith. this is simply not true. the moslem conquest of palestine did not involve any mass immigration from the arabs of the arabian peninsula into palestine or any colonization of that country . the number of invaders was very small and they were assimulated by the indegenous population. many of the orginal inhabitants were converted to islam and ,as a consequence, the predominantly arab christian population became predominantly arab moslem.the palestinians are the continuous inhabitants of israel 'from time immemorial'. where as the first israelite occupation was only an episode in the history of a arab country.

i have explain this all before and all you do is spurt the standard propoganda line, which has been proven to be false and is pure mythology

"obviously laura your understanding of palestinian history, and for that matter jewish history, is based on the zionist version of history, which is full of myths and distortions. books such as joan peters 'from time immemorial' which was proven to be a total fraud from start to finish, yet is still a best seller for the purblind orthodoxy in america is a perfect example".
................................................
Proven by who? I'm curious about your sources. My understanding of history is based upon facts, archeological evidence. The Jewish presence in Israel goes back almost 4000 years. Yours is based on muslim mythology. But why even attempt to reason with a pathetic moonbat.

when joan peters book, 'from time immemorial:the origin of the arab- jewish conflict over palestine' was published in the US the critics were united in awe at the epic scale, thoroughness and the accuracy of her reasearch and scholarship.
when joan peters book was printed overseas it was swiftly and igominiously demolished. 'ludicrous and worthless' concluded the historian albert hourani;'preposterous',enjoined sir ian and david gilmour in a 8000 world hatchet job in the london review of books; in israel ,the labour party daily davar likened it to more lamentable of the country's past propoganda exicises; and avishai margalit, head of the philosophy dept at the hebrew university, called it 'a web of deceit'.
then you have what norman finkelstein concluded- her investigation had been neither first hand,original or rigorous, but merely a delving into 'half a century's zionist propoganda tracts'. the result was 'among the most spectacular frauds ever plublished on the arab-israel conflict'; 'no mean distinction', he added, 'in a field littered with crass propoganda, forgeries and fakes'

the list goes on and on ,yet its still a best seller in america, especially with 'know nothing american zionis such as yourself.

Finkelstein? LOL just as I expected, your sources are radical left moonbats just like yourself.

Finkelstein is also BTW a holocaust denier.