Soccer Dad

what type of peace does israel expect when it still builds illegal settlements and still drives arabs from their homes.if thats what you call 'committed to peace' the palestinians should pack up now and go home. thats right ,they can't go home- so it looks like many arab and jews will die for everyones so called commitment to peace.

They can go home to the already existing Arab state in Palestine, Jordan, or any of the other 22 Arab states.

What keeps American pressure a perennially unfulfilled exercise is G-d. Never lose sight of it - when the Jew believes in Hashem, nothing America says can ever harm the Jew.

laura, i see your a advocate of ethnic cleansing or in zionist terms 'population transfer'.

your logic goes as follows: israel has the right to occupy palestinian land, lay siege to palestinian populations in bantustans surrounded by an apartheid wall, starve the population, cut them off from fuel and electricity, uproot their trees and crops, and launch periodic raids and targeted assassinations against them and their elected leadership, and if this population resists these massive israeli attacks against their lives and the fabric of their society and israel responds by slaughtering them en masse, israel would simply be "defending" itself as it must and should. after all , the palestinians should leave their homeland and take up residence in jordan which will now become a palestinian state.
you would have made a wonderful nazi

you better hope america doesn't declare itself a christian state, using your logic

Israel is not an occupier since there was never any such sovereign state of palestine.

Population transfer was done with the ethnic Germans of Czechlovakia after WW2 and between muslims and Hindus upon the creation of Pakistan. Jews were ethnically cleansed from Gaza and the "palestinians" demand that their state be free of Jews. None of these were seen as evil. Somehow though the idea of transfering the Arab population of Judea and Samaria to Arab countries is considered especially evil and racist. Again we see the display of hypocrisy from Israel haters. Explain why its perfectly acceptable for the Arab states, including a potential state of palestine, to be free of Jews but racist if any Jews dare suggest the so-called palestinians should be the ones transfered?

You sass are the nazi since you support the ethnic cleansing of Jews and the destruction of the Jewish state.

it isn't acceptable that the jewish citizens be transfered from their homeland in arab states. it was a practice the zionist started and in response some arabs followed. the zionist even encouraged anti semitism to help the jews of arab countries feel insecure and then migrate to the new jewish state. the ingathering of iraqi jews is a perfect example, in which zionist agents set off bombs to scare the iraqi jew to israel.
i am not a fan of a two state solution and would prefer to see a single secular state. not a jewish state or a muslim state but a state of the people- you know western style democracy

the zionist even encouraged anti semitism to help the jews of arab countries feel insecure and then migrate to the new jewish state. the ingathering of iraqi jews is a perfect example, in which zionist agents set off bombs to scare the iraqi jew to israel.

There is some disagreement among historians about the incident in Iraq you are referring to. And in any event, you are ignoring 99 percent of what happened. Read Norman Stillman's "The Jews of Arab Lands in Modern Times" or "The Forgotten Millions" anthology or "Locked Doors" by Levin and Neiman or "Jews of Arab and Islamic Countries" by Heskel Haddad. I see Haddad also has a book called "Born in Baghdad," which I haven't looked at it, but which is probably worthwhile.

A secular western style democracy would not be the outcome upon the creation of a single state, but rather it would eventually place the arab muslim population in the majority, which would mean this state would then become an islamic state where Jews would face persecution. There are no arab states which are western style democracies. However Israel already is a western style democracy.

israel must be the only 'western style' democracy which persecutes muslims and christians.
please,do not insult secular democracies by comparing it to the racist 'national' policies of israel. as i said before, israel is more like iran.tell me whats the difference between a islamic republic and a jewish state.

if the zionist needed to bomb the iraqi jews to migrate to israel that proves they were quite happy and not a persecuted people like the palestinians of today. all you have to do is look at what happening in israel and the occup[ied territories and you can see who is persecuting who over religion. in the end the jews were no different that any past oppressor.

sass, the zionists did NOT bomb the iraqi jews, that "theory" has been debunked.
try getting some new falsified "evidence."

it has not been debunked at all. your theory is just that ,a theory ,a zionist propoganda theory. next you'll be saying that the bombs set of in eygpt were not zionist bombs which lead to the lavon affair. its pretty obvious what was happening during those years.