The accusations caused a furor here and abroad because they came on top of others that the civilian death toll was high and that soldiers took an unusually aggressive approach in Gaza.The accounts that have received the most attention came from a taped conversation of Gaza veterans at a pre-military course. The soldiers there told of a sniper killing a woman and her two children walking in a no-go zone and of another case in which an elderly woman was shot dead for approaching a commandeered house.
The army's advocate general has opened an investigation and has not yet issued a report. But officers familiar with the investigation say that those who spoke of the killing of the mother and her children did not witness it and that it almost certainly did not occur. Warning shots were fired near the family but not at it, the officers said, and a rumor spread among the troops of an improper shooting.
The second killing may also not have occurred, they said, although a similar event was recounted by Col. Herzl Halevy in January in the newspaper Yediot Aharonot.
Recall that Bronner reported the supposed war crimes without any scrutiny. By the time Bronner wrote about the Ha'aretz charges, Ynet had published a story contradicting the charges. Bronner also researched the unsubstantiated claim he reported last week that suggested that rabbis were encouraging the soldiers to be more violent. His conclusion this week, is that there's no evidence to support that conclusion.
(h/t Yaacov Lozowick)
CAMERA Snapshots notes the article with a dose of cynicism.
Having reported extensively on Operation Cast Lead while it was happening, Bronner surely knows that the nature of combat in Gaza demands the careful treatment of civilian-killing stories; as a journalist, he surely sensed that the original claims were thinly-sourced; and as a reporter covering Israel, he surely knows that false atrocity stories are a standard Palestinian PR tactic -- and that none of them have ever proven true, from Mohammad Al-Dura in 2000 to Jenin in 2002 to the UN school bombing in 2009. It's good that he wrote a responsible followup. It's bad that he gave so much attention to the story in the first place.
UPDATE: On a related note, please see Barry Rubin.
Crossposted on Yourish.
Posted by SoccerDad at March 29, 2009 6:40 AMlmao, didn't occour? Just like they didn't shell a house full of civilians, attacked civilian ambulances, attack civilians with WP, bomb civilians standing outside a UN compound, bomb a food wharehouse, etc. It's laughable how you try to hide the truth about Israeli war crimes with lies and deciet. Wait, don't tell me, you're either a jew or a christian, lol at the hypocrisy!
Posted by: swizzle at March 29, 2009 12:35 PMNone of that was done by the IDF. That was done by your hamas friends. Wait don't tell me, you're a filthy raghead muslim. I hope David removes this thing.
Posted by: Laura at March 29, 2009 12:59 PMDon't remove, it's too funny to know that their are people like "swizzle" out there.
Posted by: Yisrael Medad, Shiloh, Israel at March 29, 2009 3:42 PMBomb a "food warehouse"?? Where would a food warehouse be in a Palestinian so-called refugee camp?? And of course, your charge about "WP" shows either ignorance of IDF rules of engagemnet or youre simply a lefty poster bot with the apt s/n of swizzle. I'm guessing the latter. It's getting tougher to re-write history nowadays swizz, but since we know you have to feed yourself in Obama's depression, I say post on!!!
Posted by: Rick554 at March 29, 2009 3:53 PMDear Swizzle: That's not war crimes, that's war. Those "ambulences" were terrorist taxis. Your Internet name is well chosen. Your head seems to be turning like one of those plastic sticks they stir cocktails with!
Posted by: Miranda Rose Smith at March 30, 2009 2:59 AM