March 27, 2009

Iran and hamas, partners in peace

In an editorial, the New York Times questions whether Binyamin Netanyahu can be trusted to make peace. There is so much wrong with "Being a partner for peace", I could spend all day critiquing it. But one point stood out:

If Mr. Netanyahu is serious about being a partner for peace, he will not get in the way of the militant group Hamas entering a Palestinian unity government with the rival Fatah faction -- as long as that government is committed to preventing terrorism and accepts past agreements between Israel and the Palestinians. He will recognize that the United States has its own interests in diplomacy with Syria, Iran and the Palestinians -- and allow the Obama administration the freedom to pursue them. He also will not start a preventive war with Iran.

So that's it, in order to prove that he's committed to peace, according to the Times, Netanyahu must trust a terrorist organization committed in word and deed to Israel's destruction to join a governemt with Fatah, which, at least, doesn't openly call for Israel's destruction. Why in there world is Hamas assumed to be a "partner for peace?" Does "qassam" mean "peace" in Arabic?

And the absurdity of the rest of the paragraph is unbelievable. Netanyahu would dictate to America? Who wrote this? Chas Freeman? And while the editors of the Times object to Israel starting a "preventive war" against Iran, they apparently don't object to Iran launching a war of any sort against Israel.

Despite the Times portrayal of Netanyahu's first term as Prime Minister he withdrew Israel from most of Hebron while Arafat collected foreign aid, arms, organized terror and incited his population against Israel. But somehow it's Netanyahu who has to prove his commitment to peace?

My Right Word dismisses the editorial with:

If peace is truly the goal and not some unadulterated anti-Israel agenda, well, who cares about the sanctity of a process?

Crossposted on Yourish.

Posted by SoccerDad at March 27, 2009 6:12 AM
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Ma.gnolia
  • blogmarks
  • BlinkList
  • NewsVine
  • scuttle
  • Fark
  • Shadows
Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

No Jesus said "turn the other cheak", but that only applies to the Jews. He said "there is neither Jew nor Greek", again only applies to the Jews at least the neither part. And one last Jewish mythological quote, "then arose a Pharoah who knew not Joseph" this one applies to my home the USA.

Posted by: Will at March 27, 2009 9:16 AM

As annoyed as I get with the newspapers and foreigners (non-Israelis), I'm much angrier with the Israeli politicians and media.
I blog, but I have very little influence.
I hope to start a business as a "life coach." I'd love to take on the politicians as clients and help them overcome whatever is blocking them.

Posted by: Batya at March 27, 2009 9:51 AM

Writers for the NY Times are not in charge of their faculties.

I look forward to the day when the Times is out of business.

Posted by: Laura at March 27, 2009 12:19 PM

jews cannot be trusted in anything, look at how many women and kids they killed in Palestine. They've committed war crimes, you talk of terrorists but don't mention Israel when you do, such ignorance.

Posted by: swizzle at March 27, 2009 7:23 PM

Hamas and Fatah do not accept Israiel's existence.
As long as this exists there will be no peace in the Near East.


Posted by: Gunter A. Weber at March 27, 2009 11:12 PM
Post a comment

Remember personal info?