Why Hamas Is More Powerful Than Hizbollah
In his article, Anatomy of Israel's Cease Fire Declaration: Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory,
David Bedein addresses the new reality of what it means to go to war with Hamas--a reality that was ignored, not understood, or perhaps just underestimated when Israel began to pull out of Gaza.
As if it were not enough that Israel pulled out of Gaza, and left Hamas free to rearm at its leisure--
The
unkindest cut of all came the next day, when the head of Israeli
intelligence told the Israeli cabinet that it would only take the
Gazans another two months to develop new ways to import new weapons.
Even
worse, Israel's self-imposed cease-fire occurred without the return of
the one POW in the hands of Hamas, without control over the smuggling
routes from Egypt, and without the disarmament of Israel's most lethal
adversaries
More to the point, Bedein criticizes the Israeli leadership for failing to understand the nature of the enemy:
Contrary
to the illusion that Israel is only at war with a terror group, and not
with the Palestinian population, it is that very terror group which was
chosen by the Palestinian people in Gaza AND in the west bank in the
January 2006 elections that were encouraged and overseen by the
American government.
What that means is that one people is
fighting another people. For the first time in Israel's sixty year war
for independence, the Jewish state faces an enemy that is embedded in a
genuinely popular movement.
That contrasts with 1948 until 1973, when Israel fought off totalitarian states.
That contrasts with 1974 until 2004, when Israel coped with a terrorist outfit operated by a corrupt pedofile.
Israel now copes with Islamic movements who operate with a popular power base, from Hizbullah to Hamas.
Israel
must now cope with a civilian army that operates under the cover of a
civilian population which has also trained combatants among women and
school children.
In this war, it will not be enough for Israel to defeat those who are formally defined as fighters.
The distinction, which was lost by the government, is only beginning to be realized:
Yet any Israeli cessation of hostilities with an ideological adversary will find still find that adversary at war.
There
is no greater tenacity than the tenacity of a people who are ready to
sacrifice thousands of their people in order to defeat another people.
The
lesson of World War II is that when a nation wants to achieve peace
with a fanatic ideologue, it must insist on total victory and
unconditional surrender - and not rely on the wishful thinking of a
unilateral cease fire, under the illusion that other side would stop
fighting because of heavy casualties.
At the end of the
day, it appears that Hamas is not really living in the shadow of
Hizbollah after all. They have gone one step further than Hizbollah and
have in fact suceeded in creating a true terrorist state.
And
Olmert, with the aid of Livni and Barak, have just given them even
greater recognition and validation than they did with the Disengagement.
UPDATE: Ed Morrissey takes a very different view. He quotes from
the Jerusalem Post...
In
a speech broadcast on Hamas television on Sunday night, Hamas Prime
Minister Ismail Haniyeh said the Palestinians had achieved a historical
and strategic victory over Israel, and claimed that Israel's military
operation in the Gaza Strip had failed.
Hamas agrees to ceasefire, gives IDF week to leave Gaza
The
Hamas leader repeated the terror organization's demand for a complete
Israeli withdrawal from the Strip, and for the opening of the border
crossings.
...and then writes:
Earlier,
Iran had threatened to cut off funds to Hamas if they agreed to a
cease-fire. That opened a split between Hamas leadership in Gaza and
the international leadership in Damascus. The Iranian retreat speaks
much louder about Hamas' performance in this war than Hamas'
self-serving pronouncements. Iran realized, perhaps after Israel easily
destroyed the special commando group that Iran trained, that Hamas
would at best barely survive this war.
Iran can paint their
retreat in hosannas of flowery praise, but even their statement
recognizes the defeat Hamas suffered. The victory will be "complete",
Iran says, when Israel retreats from Gaza, ends its border control, and
everyone in the world ends contacts with Israel. Well, sure, if that
had happened, Israel would have lost. Unfortunately for Iran, none of
it has happened, and except for the withdrawal, none of it will as long
as Iran's proxy terrorist group remains in control of Gaza. Tehran
knows it lost this gambit, and they're trying to bolster Hamas'
reputation after a disastrous provocation exposed them as lousy
terrorists and even worse soldiers.
Morrissey sees Hamas as having nothing but bluster to show for the past 3 weeks.
Let's hope he is right.
In any event, Israelis are not fooled and see that the government has failed--regardless of Hamas's setback.
David Hazony writes that the polls already show that Likud has made gains:
Despite
all their efforts to lower expectations, and the much-touted "learning
from the experience of 2006″ in waging both a diplomatic and military
campaign, Israel's leaders have, once again, completely misread the
demands of the Israeli public. Israelis are willing to go to war on
exactly one condition: That it bring peace, or at least safety and
security of its citizens. Right now this does not seem to be happening.
The government has done a lousy job of convincing average Israelis that
leaving Hamas in place, preventing arms smuggling through another
international agreement, currying the support of world leaders, and
abandoning Gilad Shalit to his fate are indications of Israel having
gone in and done the job. And now, the much-delayed election campaign
begins in earnest.
Will a right-wing government do a better job? Most Israelis seem to think so. But Israeli politics are funny that way...
by
Daled Amos
Posted by daledamos at January 19, 2009 1:23 PM
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.