December 10, 2008

Is it good for the jews?

Headline from JTA: The Global News Service of the Jewish People:

Blagojevich arrest could send Jewish rep to Senate

Who?

That suits U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) fine. JTA has learned that Schakowsky, the only Jewish contender to replace Obama, is the "Senate Candidate 3" in the prosecution complaint.

Sources close to Schakowsky, 64, suggested that her frustration until Monday at not being able to get a sense from Blagojevich as to her Senate prospects flowered into relief Tuesday when she discovered he was not considering her.

"The governor never asked her for anything in return," said a source close to Schakowsky. "That turns out to be a good thing."

We already missed out on the really interesting "Jew in the Senate" news. If the recount had gone Al Franken's way, he would have been the fourth consecutive Jew to hold that seat. The last three men to hold that seat were Rudy Boschwitz, Paul Wellstone and Norm Coleman. I'm glad that Coleman prevailed. I just find it surprising that Minnesota rather than California, Illinois, Florida or New York would have a "Jewish" seat in the Senate.

Crossposted on Yourish.

Posted by SoccerDad at December 10, 2008 5:33 AM
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Ma.gnolia
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlinkList
  • NewsVine
  • scuttle
  • Fark
  • Shadows
Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!
Comments

Chuck Schumer is Jewish and isn't Boxer?

Posted by: Laura at December 10, 2008 12:27 PM

>> I'm glad that Coleman prevailed.

Coleman hasn't prevailed yet. The number of disputed ballots is 30X the size of the difference in the vote totals so far.

Due the the silly way disputed ballots were handled during the recount (they are removed from the totals until a commission decides if they should be added back), it is to a candidate's advantage to make a lot of frivolous challenges to his opponents ballots. (It gives you an artificial lead which fools people like soccerdad into thinking you've won)

The Minneapolis Star-Tribune has a webpage where people can look at disputed ballots and decide for themselves who the vote should be for. The result of that poll indicate that Coleman's challenges are a bit more frivolous than Franken's, which Franken is likely to pick up more votes than Coleman, when those ballots are officially reviewed next week.

Posted by: James Curran at December 10, 2008 1:54 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?