Is This Why The Press Is In The Tank For Obama?
In
Obama's Ever-Changing Story About Ayers, I quoted
JustOneMinute who suggests
it
seems to me that since Obama is covering something up he has become
indebted to people (such as Bill Ayers) who are abetting that cover-up.
What favors are acruing here, and how deeply does the Chicago machine
have their hooks into Obama? I don't think we will find out by ignoring
this.
Now I see that
Mark Steyn refers to a
Michelle Malkin post to suggest that the debt may be in the opposite direction:
The
reason the press are going to such shameless lengths to drag Obama
across the finish line is because he's their last best hope at
restoring the old media environment, including a new Unfairness
Doctrine for radio, and regulation of the Internet.
Brian C. Anderson writes in The New York Post:
Yes,
the Obama campaign said some months back that the candidate doesn't
seek to re-impose this regulation, which, until Ronald Reagan's FCC
phased it out in the 1980s, required TV and radio broadcasters to give
balanced airtime to opposing viewpoints or face steep fines or even
loss of license. But most Democrats - including party elders Nancy
Pelosi, John Kerry and Al Gore - strongly support the idea of mandating
"fairness."
Would a President Obama veto a new Fairness Doctrine if Congress enacted one? It's doubtful.
Read the whole thing.
It's
an idea--though the beneficiaries would be, as Steyn himself points
out, the radio and the Internet and not the press per se.
by
Daled Amos
Posted by daledamos at October 24, 2008 1:29 PM
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.