Joe Klein defends the press against the attacks of the McCain campaign.
So what's going on here? Two things. McCain is just plain angry at us. By the evidence presented in the utterly revealing Time interview, he's ballistic. This is a politician who needs to see himself as the man on the white horse, boldly traversing a muddy field...any intimations that he's gotten muddied in the process, or has decided to throw mud, are intolerable.The second thing is more insidious: Steve Schmidt has decided, for tactical reasons, to slime the press. He wants the public to believe that there is an unfair--sexist (you gotta love it)--personal assault going on against Palin and her family. This is a smokescreen, intended to divert attention from the very real and responsible vetting that is taking place in the media--about the substance of Palin's record as mayor and governor. Sure, there are a few outliers--and the tabloid press--who have fixed on baby stories. That was inevitable....the flip side of the personal stories that the McCain team thought would work to their advantage--Palin's moose-hunting and wolf-shooting, and her admirable decision to have a Down Syndrome baby. And yes, when we all fix on the same story, whether it's a hurricane or a little-known politician, a zoo ensues. But the media coverage of the Palin story has been well within the bounds of responsibility. Schmidt is trying to make it seem otherwise, a desperate tactic.
(via memeorandum)
May I just recommend what Ross Douthat wrote yesterday. Douthat is a conservative writing at the Atlantic, but he's a lot less partisan than I am. But even he's seen enough:
I normally have great admiration for the New York Times, which decided to run three above-the-fold stories about a seventeen-year-old girl's pregnancy yesterday (we all remember, of course, the zeal with which the Times pursued the John Edwards-Rielle Hunter scandal during his Presidential campaign), while publishing (and then retracting) the claim that Sarah Palin was a member of the Alaska Independence Party.
He also takes on the Washington Post and Slate.
(Instapundit on how to have avoided the the story about Bristol's pregnancy. Heh!)
More reaction to Palin's speech at Instapundit. Regrading the New Republic headline: Who was who's supposedly alarmed about strong women?
Posted by SoccerDad at September 4, 2008 4:43 AMThe very thought of the press vetting a Republican candidate for VP. Do they actually think they are "helping?"
Why don't they go digging in Obama's neighborhood? Why don't they ask their "tough questions" about him?
Ever notice how when they interview a liberal --it's either an open ended question or one that frames things in a positive light so that the answer is "Yes, blah, blah, blah..."
But, with the conservatives it's always "But, don't you think...?"
Well, the answer is "No, I don't think that. If I had thought that, I would have said that in the first place. Do you actually work for Obama? Because you are framing your question as a liberal talking point."
That could pretty much be the standard answer to any question put to a conservative.
Except for Giuliani--he won't let it rest goes for the jugular--Go Rudy! Carly too!
"But, don't you think...?" NO!!
Lot of cussing at the TV tonight b/c of the press people.
NO!! NO!! NObama ..... blah, blah, blah...
Posted by: Abe Bird at September 4, 2008 8:28 AMIt's interesting that conservatives are suddenly bothered by the media's sexist treatment of Palin. Where were they during the primaries?
Posted by: Laura at September 4, 2008 12:55 PM