In the Great non-Sequitir (or here), Charles Krauthammer identifies Sen. Obama's appeal
How did Obama pull that off? By riding one of the great non sequiturs of modern American politics.It goes like this. Because Obama transcends race, it is therefore assumed that he will transcend everything else -- divisions of region, class, party, generation and ideology.
The premise here is true -- Obama does transcend race; he has not run as a candidate of minority grievance; his vision of America is unmistakably post-racial -- but the conclusion does not necessarily follow. It is merely suggested in Obama's rhetorically brilliant celebration of American unity: "young and old, rich and poor, black and white, Latino and Asian -- who are tired of a politics that divides us." Hence "the choice in this election is not between regions or religions or genders. It's not about rich versus poor; young versus old; and it is not about black versus white. It's about the past versus the future."
The hope he's been vending that he is something new in American politics. But Krauthammer points out that the successful approach that Sen. Clinton took was to ask the American people: do you really know how Sen. Obama represents hope? Do you know him?
The funny thing is that as Krauthammer shows, this approach may help a different candidate even better than it helps Sen. Clinton.
On the difficult compromises that required the political courage to challenge one's own political constituency, Obama flinched: the "gang of 14" compromise on judicial appointments, the immigration compromise to which Obama tried to append union-backed killer amendments, and, just last month, the compromise on warrantless eavesdropping that garnered 68 votes in the Senate. But not Obama's.Who, in fact, supported all of these bipartisan deals, was a central player in two of them, and brokered the even more notorious McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform? John McCain, of course.
Yes, John McCain -- intemperate and rough-edged, of sharp elbows and even sharper tongue. Turns out that uniting is not a matter of rhetoric or manner, but of character and courage.
Maybe the early snapshots of electoral math isn't nearly daunting as it first appears.
john mccain,
barack obama.,
hillary clinton
The premise here is true -- Obama does transcend race; he has not run as a candidate of minority grievance; his vision of America is unmistakably post-racial -- but the conclusion does not necessarily follow. It is merely suggested in Obama's rhetorically brilliant celebration of American unity: "young and old, rich and poor, black and white, Latino and Asian -- who are tired of a politics that divides us." Hence "the choice in this election is not between regions or religions or genders. It's not about rich versus poor; young versus old; and it is not about black versus white. It's about the past versus the future."
...........................
Such phony rhetoric about unity by obama makes me nauseated. While he mouths platitudes about American unity and transcending race, thugs on his behalf intimidate and threaten black superdelegates that they had better switch their vote to their man or else. And while he was making speeches about racial unity, his wife and Oprah Winfrey were telling black voters they needed to vote for him because in the words of Oprah "he's one of y'all" and in the words of Obama's wife, blacks will come to their senses and vote for her husband.