June 27, 2007

Walmart orthodoxy

OrthoMom points to a story in the NYT about WalMart's efforts to build a SuperCenter near Monsey. (According to the article, if successful in building the story, WalMart will close a nearby store in Airmont.)

I understand some of the complaints, but is Wal-Mart really bad for an insular Orthodox Jewish community. No doubt, as I'll write later, some small businesses could find themselves in trouble. But there's a place (and time) when Wal-Mart and the Hareidi world co-exist quite nicely - Monticello NY during the summer.

If you've ever gone to visiting day in the Catskills, part of the experience is a mandatory family outing to the Monticello Wal-Mart SuperCenter. It is the largest Wal-Mart I've ever been in.

Due to its proximity to Orthodox Jewish camps and bungalow colonies, it stocks an impressive array of products for Orthodox Jews. I doubt that any other Wal-Mart carries Mishpachah brand. And my wife noticed that the Monticello Wal-Mart also has modest summer clothes for women; not something that's always easy to find. And certainly difficult to find at reasonable prices.

I realize that none of this means anything to someone who believes that because of the low wages and economic displacement, Wal-Mart is evil. This is an understandable reaction of someone who is more familiar with pro-union ideology than with the discipline of economics.

But the low wage jobs that WalMart offers are an effective entry to the workforce for unskilled laborers. It gives them experience that allows them to either move up in Wal-Mart or find a job elsewhere when they're ready.

Wal-Mart's savings to consumers - especially low income consumers - measures not in pennies but in billions of dollars.

The major negative economic impact of Wal-Mart is the effect it has on small stores - mom and pop shops. According to a paper by West Virginia University professors competition from Wal-Mart will drive some smaller operations out of business, but other small businesses with different merchandise will replace them. Or

Saving traditional small ‘mom and pop’ businesses has been a justification for political and court decisions preventing Wal-Mart from opening new stores virtually everywhere across the United States. We present the first rigorous econometric investigation of how Wal-Mart actually impacts the small business sector. We examine the rate of self-employment and the number of smallemployer establishments using both time-series and cross-sectional data. Contrary to popular belief, our results suggest that the process of creative destruction unleashed by Wal-Mart has had no statistically significant long-run impact on the overall size and profitability of the small business sector in the United States.

And, while it's out of Wal-Mart's usual area of operation there's no denying that it was likely more effective in dealing with the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina than any of 3 levels of government. It inspired columninst John Tierney to advocate for WEMA instead of FEMA.

As the evidence, Wolf, continues to mount, that the government managed to blow it pretty much on all levels, federal, state, local, when it came to Katrina, maybe it's time to look to the private sector for some meaningful results. For example, the world's largest company, Wal-Mart, actually improved its image as a result of Hurricane Katrina, so much so that John Tierney, who is an op-ed columnist for "The New York Times," is suggesting today putting Wal- Mart CEO Lee Scott in charge of rebuilding the Gulf Coast.

Now, Wal-Mart trucks rolled in right after the hurricane hit, long before any government assistance showed up. The stores opened their doors, said, take what you want. They gave away supplies to the people who needed them. The company had its own emergency operations center in place and operating a week before Katrina hit. It sounds like the government could take some lessons.

So, the question for this hour is this: Should the Hurricane Katrina recovery be turned over to Wal-Mart? Doesn't sound like a bad idea to me. CaffertyFile.com -- one word. And we will read some of your letters a little later.

One footnote to this. In 1997, Congress gave FEMA $500,000 and they said, we want you to take this money and develop an evacuation plan for the city of New Orleans. FEMA gave the money to the state of Louisiana and they used it to study building a bridge. So, you know, the government just continues to amaze as we move through this thing.

This is not to say that Wal-Mart is altruistic. It isn't. It's a business. But a well run business benefits many people and the good it does vastly outweighs the bad it causes.

I guess we'll see if the Monsey community will eventually see it that way.

Other comments SerAndEz and Emes Ve'emunah.

, , .

Posted by SoccerDad at June 27, 2007 7:47 AM | TrackBack
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Ma.gnolia
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlinkList
  • NewsVine
  • scuttle
  • Fark
  • Shadows
Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!
Comments
As the evidence, Wolf, continues to mount, that the government managed to blow it pretty much on all levels, federal, state, local, when it came to Katrina, maybe it's time to look to the private sector for some meaningful results.

news reporters missed the biggest story of all after Hurricane katrina. While reporting on untrue stories of rape, mayhem, and murder in the Supredome, they missed the biggest rescue operation. They missed the National Guard in the Superdome co-ordinating rescue efforts while rationing supplies. While concetrating on the fact that those resuced were placed on I-10 without water for hours, they missed the fact that 50,000 were resuced from their homes.

They missed the fact that Louisiana Wildlife officers along with the Coast Guard and National Guard were busy doing something. In short, they missed the biggest story of all.

Not to mention they missed the other success story. That of Mississippi. Mississippi took a direct hit. I was in the hurricane and I am still here. What I saw was the tremendous effort it took to get ice, water, and food to us on the Mississippi Gulf Coast within three days. It was a logistical chore. Major bridges had been wiped out by Katrina. Railroads had been wiped out by Katrina. Major roads throughtout Mississippi were blocked by power lines and trees. But the FEMA turcks full of water, ice, and food made it here within 3 days.

Another story the news media doesn't mention is the tremendous generosity of US citizens. Back in January, the Mississippi Gulf Coast had its 500,000 volunteer come through. What is so remarkable is that almost two years later, volunteers are still helping us pick-up the pieces and rebuild. But more than that, it is their smiles and the thought that we haven't been forgotten gives us the strength to carry-on in the rebuilding efforts.

The news media did New Orleans tremendous harm with its reporting. They didn't give Americans the true story. Ask yourself this, the National Guard had enough supplies on hand for those in the Superdome to have one meal a day plus water. Why scream for more water, ice, and food to be brought in? Shouldn't the focus be on getting people out of New Orleans? Which was done in a very timely manner consider the degree of flooding from the failed levees.

Posted by: seawitch at June 27, 2007 9:37 AM

Thanks for the link. I am quite sure that the opening of a new WalMart may create a less than desirable financial reality for some of the smaller, Orthodox-owned, stores that exist in that area. But I can't help but feel that instead of addressing that very real concern, the residents' are simply playing the usually tried-and-true religion card. It seems a little disingenuous to me.

Posted by: orthomom at June 27, 2007 10:27 AM

I went to that Monticello Wal-Mart when we visited Shayna at camp last summer. The array of kosher packaged food for sale was kind of cool, but my main reaction to being in a secular store where 75% of the patrons were visibly Jewish was one of extreme discomfort and anxiety. Maybe I have what used to be called the "galut mentality", but I couldn't cope with all the loud, brash New Yorkers there, and was virtually terrified of being associated with them. All I wanted to do was hide the fact that I was Jewish.

I wonder if anyone else has this type of reaction, or if it's just my personal hangup?

Posted by: Elie at June 27, 2007 11:04 AM