June 19, 2007

The logical conclusion

Fouad Ajami writes in Brothers to the Bitter End

The Palestinian ruin was a long time in coming. No other national movement has had the indulgence granted the Palestinians over the last half-century, and the results can be seen in the bravado and the senseless violence, in the inability of a people to come to terms with their condition and their needs.

He holds the rest of the Arab world culpable for this state of affairs

For decades, Arab society granted the Palestinians everything and nothing at the same time. The Arab states built worlds of their own, had their own priorities, dreaded and loathed the Palestinians as outsiders and agitators, but left them to the illusion that Palestine was an all-consuming Arab concern.

Now the Palestinians should know better. The center of Arab politics has shifted from the Mediterranean to the Persian Gulf, a great political windfall has come to the lands of the Gulf and the Arabian Peninsula, vast new wealth due to the recent rises in oil prices, while misery overwhelms the Palestinians. No Arabs wait for Palestine anymore; they have left the Palestinians to the ruin of their own history.

My quibble with Ajami is that Fatah doesn't represent so much a national movement but rather a criminal syndicate, vindicated by its claims of national liberation. Daniel Pipes wrote in 1983

In short, the PLO's acts of violence against its own people-grenades against laborers seeking work in Israel, bullets for those on the West Bank and Gaza who disagree with its policies, truncheons for those living in the camps-closely resemble the policies of the governments that champion it most fervently. Remove the framework of a "liberation movement," and what remains is the sort of dictatorial regime all too familiar in the Middle East. Only the fact that the PLO does not rule a territory endows it with the aura of romance lacking in "progressive" states already in power. But the PLO's record should make its character clear enough. Like other radical movements, this organization appeals to two groups primarily-the elite that it benefits and the distant admirers who stay far enough away to avoid the consequences.

(Yes, I know, I quote this article a lot. It may be 24 years old but it was amazingly accurate and is still relevant after all these years. This 10 year old article also lays out some of the background for the current violence.)

And again, Cox and Forkum make the point in a single picture.

UPDATE: More links at Buzztracker.

Posted by SoccerDad at June 19, 2007 6:00 AM | TrackBack
Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • Spurl
  • YahooMyWeb
  • co.mments
  • Ma.gnolia
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • BlinkList
  • NewsVine
  • scuttle
  • Fark
  • Shadows
Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!
Comments

When you look at Israeli leaders, you see a group of leaders who are relatively free of financial corruption. Not that they are/were saints, but you don't hear about Peres' or Barak's or Netanyahu's multi-million dollar property holdings in New York, Zurich, etc. They have the demeanor and finances, by all appearances, of perhaps upper management in a U.S. government agency, maybe one notch below an undersecretary in a U.S. cabinet. They may or may not have been brutal to the Palestinians, and if brutal may or may not have been justified, but they were/are not "big pimping."

Compare this to the Soprano-esque thuggery, cash baths and numbered accounts which characterize the "leadership" of Palestinian governing factions, past and present, while in charge of much smaller and poorer constituencies.

Posted by: Bruce/Crablaw at June 20, 2007 10:09 PM