h/t Penny Stock and Elie's Expositions.
I'm not going to reveal the name of the 7th Harry Potter Book. Then again if you haven't been living in some spider hole, you probably know it already. But in case you don't - don't follow the links above! - go to her site, click on the eraser on the desk and do the stuff in the correct sequence - not all of it obvious - that gets you to the Hangman game. (Heh, spider hole, Hangman.)
The title is interesting and I have no idea what to make of it.
Presence has an idea that he expresses at Harry Potter Prognostications.
The problem I have with his understanding is that it necesarily means that Harry Potter will not survive Book 7. I already wrote that I doubted that Rowling would kill off Harry Potter.
I'd be very surprised if Harry gets killed. I believe his destiny is to become the Defense of Dark Arts teacher at Hogwarts. But I can also understand her wish to "own" Harry Potter exclusively. Harry Potter, while it may be appreciated at a number of levels, is still a children's series. Having a children's series whose main character is killed just wouldn't work. If that happened Harry Potter would be deemed too dark for children younger than teens. I can't imagine that's something that Rowling seeks.
Rowling foreshadows a lot of what happens in her books. Harry giving the DaDA classes in the Order of the Phoenix suggests that this is something that he may well do in the future. Given that she also has a theme that there's a connection between Harry and Voldemort, and Voldemort (as Tom Riddle) was refused the position, suggests that Harry will get the job in the future.
My other thought is outside the scope of the narrative and has more to do with its marketing but I don't think that it can be dismissed either.
Since Book 4, JK Rowling has been promising to kill off major characters. But she does it in a coy way to provoke interest. Except in Book 6, the character killed was not of great significance. (In book 5, the character was important to Harry, but he'd only had significant roles in two of the books.)
I thought it would be interesting to go over the first 6 titles and the importance of each title to the plot.
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's (or Philosopher's) Stone - The Sorcerer's Stone was a magical stone that could be used to create a potion that would give the one imbibing it immortality. Harry and his friends figure out over the course of the book where the stone is, why Voldemort wants it and, ultimately, how to keep him from getting it. Relationship of title to main plot - Very strong.
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets - The Chamber of Secrets is where evil lives within the bowels of the Hogwarts castle. Harry, Ron and Hermoince eventually figure out how to get there and defeat a young Voldemort. Relationship of title to main plot - Very Strong.
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban - The Prisoner of Azkaban is a wizard suspected of betraying Harry's parents to Voldemort. In the end not everything as it seems. Relationship of title to main plot - Strong.
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire - The Goblet of Fire is the spell that chooses the champions for the triwizard tournament. Somehow it produces Harry's name and propels him into the contest. Relationship of title to main plot - Very Strong.
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix - The Order of the Phoenix is a secret group of wizards seeking to counter Voldemort's rise to power. But there's so much else going on the book. Harry Potter takes Umbridge doesn't quite have the proper cadence. Neither does Harry does Dark Arts. Relationship of title to main plot - Weak.
Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince - The Half Blood Prince is discovered to be a wizard (or witch) with potions. But who is it? The answer is surprising but hardly crucial. (Though it may be crucial in book 7.) Relationship of title to main plot - Very Weak.
What could I expect the title of Book 7 to be? I'd expect that as the final book in the series that the title would be crucial to the plot of the book, possibly even to the plot or theme of the series. (That would bolster Presence's thought.)
I leave you with a question: what do you think the title tells about the book and/or series?
Blogdigger tags: Harry Potter, Book 7.
Posted by SoccerDad at December 27, 2006 2:10 AM | TrackBackIn our latest hpprogs podcast (gosh I sound like a loser) I found a way to keep with Greg's theory but keep Harry alive. Fret not.
Posted by: peninah at December 27, 2006 8:54 AMI have opined many times that Harry and his two closest friends, Ron and Hermione, will not die, chiefly for the same reason you state. Otherwise all bets are off.
I really don't know what to make of the book title though. But here's an interesting comment from the discussion board on amazon.com:
"In Celtic Britain, Hallows were sacred objects. In Arthurian/Avalonian legend, the Hallows are the Cup (Grail), Sword (Excalibur), Spear, and Dish/Plate (neatly aligning with tarot suits as well). I would assume that the Deathly Hallows would refer to the objects (hallowed items) Voldemort has made into horcruxes and that Harry has to go hunt down."
BTW, I was right about there being an almost immediate IMDB entry for a HPATDH movie, targeted for 2010!
Posted by: Elie at December 27, 2006 10:41 AMI've considered the idea that "deathly hallows" refers to the horcruxes, but aren't those very unholy?
I like your analysis of the titles vs. their signficance in the book. I was thinking something along those lines recently. Are you familiar with the concept of a McGuffin? I was going to discuss whether or not each of the things mentioned in the title's were or were not McGuffins.
Posted by: Greg at December 27, 2006 11:37 AMHiya!
OK...I think that Snape and Voldemort be dealt with in book 7. But I think that Voldemort will not die but merely be discorporate, as in the first book.
I also think there's a strong possibility that Harry may have a `demise' similar to Sherlock Holmes', where his fate is uncertain. This leaves the way open for Rowling to write more Harry Potter books should she get the urge to bring him back, which may very well happen. As it did with AC Doyle and Holmes.
The `deathly hallows', to me, obvious refers to a place that Harry will have to get to so he can destroy the remaining horcruxes.
Ron and Hermione look like they're on the way to hooking up, so I don't see them dying.
I also see Dumbledore coming back into the story as an advisor, either as a ghost or a picture.
We'll see, eh?
It's kind of amusing that you wouldn't post the title in the post, but that we're supposed to discuss the title :) (I'm an ass, I know).
I actually took a darker meaning from the title -- Dictionary.com's second definition for "hallow" is "To respect or honor greatly; revere." Given the "deathly", I thought it would be a reference to a heroic sacrificial death taken by one of the characters towards the defeat of Voldemort. Then again, I might just be a little morbid.
Freedom Fighter: I actually hope we don't see Dumbledore return, even as a flashback. It seems to me that doing that would negate his death in the previous book, in which case, what was the point of killing him off? It's like the end of Star Trek Nemesis, where Data sacrifices himself, and then his "brother" starts accessing Data's personality, as an opening to bring the character back. Cheap ploy!
Posted by: Malnurtured Snay at December 28, 2006 2:53 PMPeninah - please let me know. (I'm not - currently - a podcast person.) I don't yet have an iPod or MP3 player, living or dead.
Elie - thanks for the definition.
Greg - as I e-mailed you, I was thinking sacred more as enchanted, though that's not an obvious way of interpreting sacred.
Freedom Fighter - I can accept Voldemort getting decarnated or whatever. But I think it's much more likely that his defeat will have to be permanent.
I don't believe that JK Rowling will write any Harry Potter after the series is over. I don't think that she'll kill Harry at all.
She's also been pretty clear that Dumbledore is really dead and that he's not coming back. I suppose, as you suggest, that he can help through his image in pictures and whatnot though.
Malnurtured Snay - I left the title out for those who still might want to play hangman and haven't heard the title yet. I expect that most sentient being know the title, but not using it is a formality.
Your idea is right in line with what Presence wrote at Harry Potter Prognostications.
I think it is time you become an iPod person (hint to to your wife for the next birthday perhaps?!?). In any event, It is really a very simplistic thought on my part but if Greg is correct about the DH being the spell or ritual that Lily performed in order to be able to die for Harry, and if Harry decides to perform that for the world (however that will happen)- I think he is going to go through a lot of soul searching, and will decide to go through with it- but ultimately someone else (perhaps Snape or Draco) will stand in front of him (literally or figuratively) and do it instead of him and he will live.
Just my thought.
Posted by: peninah at December 29, 2006 9:06 AM