Barry Rubin in a perceptive column "The Debate that won't Happen" this week wrote:
Therefore, there will be no big response in the region and the withdrawal will have little effect on Arab states' policies. The exception to a limited extent is Egypt which will now have to manage its border with the Gaza Strip, either getting tough or being permissive toward arms' smuggling. For the moment, though, that country is preoccupied by other things, notably the start of its presidential election campaign.Arab regimes are not going to play up the withdrawal because that will make Israel look good. As if Israel actually wants peace. They also won't play up the angle that Hamas forces Israel out because that would bring up the question why, if Hamas, is willing to fight Israel (successfully) are they not willing to fight the big bad Zionist bully that they justify all their defense spending and dictatorial authority with.
The number of Palestinians working in Israel is steadily growing. Lawfully employed Palestinians in Israel today number about 60,000, of whom some 13,000 work in industrial zones and in the settlements. All told, more than 100,000 Palestinians are estimated to be employed in Israel approaching the record number employed in 1992.So when things were going well economically the Palestinians and their supporters complained about the political process. And when disengagement is in the air - the greatest boost to the political process in a long time - the Palestinians and their supporters are complaining about the economics. Israel cannot win at this game. Lucy pulls the football away again and again and the world cheers her on.
Yasser Arafat's death last November created, it was commonly said, a golden opportunity for Palestinians to arrest their society's downward spiral into squalor and suicide bombing. It also set up a test for all those who believed that Arafat himself was the principal Palestinian problem.Diehl then goes on to enumerate the ways that the Middle East has not taken advantage of Arafat's death. Throughout the article you get the impression that Diehl never heard the term "necessary but insufficient."
Part of the problem, in fact, is that the Palestinians don't get to work at their own pace. Undoing the Arafat regime, building a new one, and finding a way to integrate or at least disarm radical forces can't easily be done in six months. But that timetable has been imposed by Israel's prime minister, Sharon, who has proceeded with his plan for the Gaza withdrawal without regard for Palestinian circumstances. Sharon clearly doesn't expect Abbas to succeed, and he has tailored his actions accordingly: Concessions to the new Palestinian regime have been held to the bare minimum required to satisfy pressure from Washington. The Israeli leader meanwhile proceeds with the unilateral solution he designed before Arafat's death. Following withdrawal from Gaza, Israel will retreat behind the border-like system of fences and walls it is constructing through the West Bank and around Jerusalem, and prepare to live with that status quo indefinitely.It's out of Palestinian hands. Sharon's only doing the minimum.
The more I read, the less supportive of disengagement I become. I think I said that recently here. It bears repeating.
Israel will only be putting herself in jeopardy and the world will still criticize her.
Posted by: Mark at August 5, 2005 11:16 PMSo true, Mark.
Soccer Dad, your post is right on target! They don't want a state next to Israel. They want it in place of Israel and will accept nothing less. That has been their plan all along and I see nothing to prove that anything has changed.
Posted by: Esther at August 6, 2005 8:36 PM