Earlier (here and here) I discussed the killing of Norhan Deeb. I thought the case was settled when the Jerusalem Post reported that a Palesitnian had been arrested for her murder. I even wrote to the ombudsman of the NY Times asking why the Times hadn't reproted it. The ombudsman got back to me and informed me that no one had been arrested.
Backspin has now linked to a very good article in the St Petersburg Times that examines the circumstances surrounding the girl's death. One of my early takes on the shooting was that the Israeli troops were too far away to have shot the girl. (Different accounts place the Israeli position as 600, 800 or 900 yards away. And Reuters reported that the soldiers weren't even in a position to see into the school yard.)
I think that these four paragraphs tell the story:
Yael Hartmann, a spokeswoman for the Israel Defense Forces, said the IDF never received any information that a Palestinian had been arrested. However, she added, the army is convinced Norhan's death was caused by Palestinian gunfire."There is no possible way it could have come from a bullet of ours," Hartmann told the Times.
The nearest Israeli outpost to the school is 900 meters away (some 2,950 feet) but the maximum range of bullets used in the soldiers' M-16 rifles is 350 meters, Hartmann said. According to the soldiers' log books, no Israeli troops were shooting in the area around the time of Norhan's death, she said.
Hartmann said the Palestinian Authority did not respond to an IDF request to help investigate Norhan's death.
I am not surprised the information has been buried. The regular press seekes out anti-Israeli stories to "balance" the atrocties committed almost daily by the Palestinians. After all that work, they have to go print the truth? Poor reporters, haven't you any pity for them? (I am becomming so sarcastic.)
Posted by: Rachel Ann at February 15, 2005 02:14 AM