Earlier this week a court found that one of the parties in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict acted in violation of standards of international law. Of course, I'm talking about Judge Ronald R. Lagueux's affirmation of Magistrate Judge David Martin's ruling that the PLO and PA were responsible for the murder of Yaron Ungar. (His wife, Efrat, was not an American citizen so their families could not sue for damages to her. Similarly, individual claims against Yasser Arafat and other leading lights of the PLO/PA were dismissed "due to lack of personal jurisdiction." The PLO/PA was determined to be responsible and denied "sovereign immunity" because it was not legally a state.) But if the Hamas Tzurif gang killed Yaron Ungar how could the PA be responsible? The plaintiffs claimed:
We have a tape of Mr. Jabali indicating that he provides Hamas terrorists support. He puts them into his own security forces. We have Mr. Dahlan. Mr. Dahlan met with Mr. Deif who is the Hamas leader right around the time of the Ungar murder. And we have information that he was given a green light to specifically conduct terrorist activities in June of 1996. We’ve asked to depose Mr. Rajoub. His men, men under his control, were the ones who gave the fake PA police documents to the actual murder[er]s of the Ungars. They’re the ones who supervised the Tzurif gang, the actual gang that was involved in killing the Ungars. We’ve asked to depose Tawiq Tarrari. He gave money. It’s been proven and documented that he gave money and weapons for specific terrorist attacks during this period of time. Mr. Al-Hindi has been accused and has documents of his same activities. Mr. Boughati is a mastermind of a series of activities during this entire period of time. Mr. Arafat, he is not just a person who happens to be a Palestinian Authority, but he himself has a direct hand in various forms of terrorism, and more specifically his signature itself was on a piece of paper indicating approval for the killing of Americans after the fact. He rewarded Palestinian terrorists in the form of compensation, financial compensation, for killing Americans.While I doubt that this would necessarily stand up in a criminal case, the case of Ungar vs. the Palestinian Authority is a civil case brought under the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991 that allows Americans to sue terrorist organizations for damages.
Hassan Abu Libdeh, secretary of the Palestinian Cabinet, told The Associated Press he believed the ruling was a political trick, raising the possibility the judiciary will be used as a political tool to fight the Palestinian Authority and PLO."If this ruling were applied to the U.S. administration itself, I think all the U.S. resources would not be enough to compensate the families of victims of U.S. policies all over the world," he said.
The Ungars were killed in a drive-by shooting near the Israeli village of Beit Shemesh as they were returning home from a wedding. One of their two children was with them but escaped unharmed.Beit Shemesh, a village? Please. It's a city. At least they didn't call it a "settlement."